# Cursor Agent vs GitHub Copilot (2026): Benchmarks, Price & Verdict | Alher Tech

> Cursor Agent vs GitHub Copilot: head-to-head 2026 comparison across Arena Elo, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, context window and pricing. Verdict + use cases.

- Canonical page: https://alhertech.com/en/ai-comparison/cursor-agent-vs-github-copilot/
- Site: Alher Tech (custom software, AI agents and SEO engineering, https://alhertech.com/)
- Contact: https://alhertech.com/en/contact/

---

|  | Cursor Agent | GitHub Copilot |
| --- | --- | --- |
| arenaElo | 1378 | 1351 |
| humanEval | 91.2 | 89.9 |
| sweBench | 62 | 55 |
| mmlu | 88.7 | 86.7 |
| gpqa | 59.4 | 55.1 |
| aime | 85 | 80 |
| Price in/out ($/M) | $0 / $0 | $0 / $0 |

## Our verdict

Cursor gives you an AI-native IDE with agent loops; Copilot brings AI into the IDE you already use. Cursor wins on agent UX; Copilot wins on integration and price. Start with Copilot; upgrade to Cursor if your team spends all day in the AI chat pane.

[Cursor Agent](https://alhertech.com/en/ai-comparison/cursor-agent/) · [GitHub Copilot](https://alhertech.com/en/ai-comparison/github-copilot/) · [All AI model comparisons](https://alhertech.com/en/ai-comparison/)