MongoDB vs MySQL, documents or Tables for Your Application?

MongoDBMySQL
MaintainerMongoDB, Inc.Oracle Corporation
First release20091995
LicenseSSPLGPLv2 (dual licensing)
Learning curveEasy to start. Documents map naturally to application objects; data modeling discipline is what separates good deployments from painful ones.Gentle, the classic starter relational database, with decades of tutorials and every framework supporting it first.
PerformanceFast document reads and writes with horizontal sharding built into the core; multi-document transactions exist but cost more than their SQL equivalents.Excellent for read-heavy OLTP; InnoDB is solid and its replication is battle-tested at planet scale (YouTube via Vitess).

Verdict

MySQL guarantees relational integrity for structured business data; MongoDB trades that rigor for schema flexibility and horizontal scaling. Orders, payments and anything with strict relationships belong in MySQL (or PostgreSQL); catalogs, profiles, events and fast-evolving models suit MongoDB. Many real systems use one of each.

MongoDB · MySQL · All technology comparisons